Theoretical System and Differentiation Form of This Book

Taking the theoretical system of this book as an example, it is undeniable that most readers will neither fully agree nor entirely disagree with its content. Suppose we view the content of this book as a theoretical tree, as the author. In that case, I have merely made choices at each decision node during the theoretical deduction process (starting from the source trunk) based on the theoretical directions I endorse. Suppose the theoretical tree of this book has 26 theoretical branching nodes from A to Z, starting from the source point 0. Readers may hold different views or propose alternative theories at specific nodes. The specification of 26 nodes does not imply that the theoretical tree has a fixed number of branching nodes; any theoretical system can be divided into different numbers of differentiation nodes using various methods. The 26 nodes here are merely a hypothetical example. Suppose a reader disagrees with the book’s view at node X and proposes an X’ theory, subsequently deriving Y’ and Z’ theoretical outcomes based on X’. In that case, it can be said that the theoretical system of this book begins to exhibit theoretical differentiation at node X. In my theoretical framework, the X’Y’Z’ theoretical differentiation should be encouraged, and I will consider providing platforms for expression and discussion of such differentiations in the future, rather than suppressing or forcibly persuading against them.