On the Multi-Role Characteristics of Organizational Individuals in the Intelligent Consortium

In neural networks, neurons typically function independently, with neurons in different or the same layers having independent parameter sets and operating in separate computational processes. Of course, this is based on my understanding of network structures, and it does not rule out the possibility of new network architectures emerging with advancements in the industry.

In the Intelligent Consortium’s network structure, organizational individuals can take on different roles at multiple nodes, performing various driving and action functions. For example, in a restaurant organization, Individual A can be a basic organizational individual (company employee) acting as a driving node at the lowest level of the organizational network, a member of the operations oversight team (supervising procurement and finance), and a member of the kitchen department (e.g., a chef developing new dishes or designing cooking processes).

Different nodes in the Intelligent Consortium’s network have distinct action or driving roles, with individuals at these nodes assuming the corresponding responsibilities. If an organizational individual takes on multiple responsibilities, they should appear at various nodes. However, if multiple nodes have the same function, an organizational individual should only occupy one of those nodes.

For example, members of an employee committee are elected representatives chosen by all organizational individuals (employees). If the organization has 10 employees, the employee committee is driven by these 10 employee nodes (influencing the committee through elections). The committee consists of three members, from whom a leader is appointed to express employee demands and opinions about the company. In this case, Employee B can be one of the 10 employee nodes, one of the three committee members, or the committee leader (unique). However, B cannot be two or more of the 10 employee nodes or two or more of the three committee members. This is because, according to the established rules, an organizational individual can appear at multiple nodes in the larger or subnetworks to perform driving and action roles. Still, these nodes must have different functions, not identical ones. If B were to appear as two or more of the 10 employee nodes, it would violate this principle by occupying multiple nodes with the same function. However, if B appears at an employee node, a committee member node, and the committee leader node, these three nodes have different functions, and thus, it does not violate the rule.